Subject: Re: [boost] Removing old config macro and increasing compiler requirements.
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-04 04:28:01
On 08/03/2013 11:08 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed Jul 31 2013, Stephen Kelly <steveire-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> That could be an option. Timing is difficult though. I still believe, as
>> I wrote before
>> that modularization should be done before repo-splitting into many (35
>> in the case of attempting to use boost::any) interdependent repos.
> Why do you believe that? It seems to me much, much easier to untangle
> undesired dependencies after the repositories are split.
A personal bias I suppose :). I don't know why you think it's much much
easier to do post-split, but I guess the reason doesn't matter too much
and it's manageable either way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk