Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [preprocessor] nested for_each not working like expected
From: paul Fultz (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-07 16:14:32

> Yes, but [2] indicates that SEQ_FOR_EACH is implemented in terms of FOR
> and has a _R version for reentry. Why is it provided if it doesn't work?

The `R` is the recursion state for the `BOOST_PP_FOR` macro. Because it is
reentrant, you don't pass the state in as a parameter, but instead append it
to the the end of the macro(ie `BOOST_PP_FOR_1`, `BOOST_PP_FOR_2`,
internally and provides a parameter for this state so it can reenter
`BOOST_PP_FOR` effeciently(otherwise it would need to deduce the state of
`BOOST_PP_FOR`). If `BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH` was reentrant as well, there would
be an additional recursion state that would needed to be appended to the end.

Paul Fultz II

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at