Re: [boost] [test] still broken in release

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] still broken in release
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-10 14:14:46

On 08/10/2013 07:11 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

> All these will produce detailed output including values of a and b in case
> if assertion fails. a and b could be collections, in which case above will
> do per element comparison. a and b could be floating point numbers in which
> case above will perform comparison with predefined tolerate (predefined for
> the series of assertions of for the whole test case, and we will also have
> an ability to specify it as second argument in above assertion). All of this
> and much much more is the function of new "super testing tool" BOOST_TEST.

Sounds good.

Assuming that my foo() function fails, how difficult is it going to be
to single-step into it (without setting breakpoints inside foo) from
a BOOST_TEST(foo()) line? This is a very common scenario for me.