Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Dividing into Boost.Thread and Boost.Sync
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-19 07:53:35

On 08/18/2013 11:31 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

> I think we can provide a minimal future abstraction that can be used
> with other execution contexts, but it would need to have as parameter
> the associated mutex and condition_variable abstraction, otherwise I
> don't see how we can do it. Maybe you have found how. If yes, I will be
> interested in knowing how?

It the most extreme case where no synchronization is needed, we have
Boost.Expected (once it is finalized.)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at