Subject: Re: [boost] Is there BOOST_ENABLE_IF macro now?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-20 06:11:39
On 20/08/13 05:29, Nathan Ridge wrote:
>> The big problem is that a proper concepts language
>> feature would require fundamental changes to what ConceptsLite proposes, so
>> it's not simply a matter of getting ConceptsLite in and then improving it
>> in the future. If ConceptsLite gets in, I find it hard to believe that C++
>> will ever get proper concept support.
> I would strongly suggest that you bring this up on std-proposals.
> As it stands, ConceptsLite appears to have fairly broad support
> within the Committee, and if issues like this are not brought up,
> it might be passed without such issues being considered carefully
His argument is that the definition of concepts and their association
with types is not rigid and formal anymore. It's just any constant
It's not a bug, it's a feature.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk