Subject: Re: [boost] [cpo-proposal] presentation of the idea
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-27 07:44:06
On 23-08-2013 17:08, Larry Evans wrote:
> AFAICT, this shows the offset_ptr would solve the problem of moving
> the storage in case the storage needs to be resized.
> Am I missing something?
I can't tell. Some interprocess experts might want to way in here?
Anyway, I can live with a container that has unstable
pointers/references after push_back. std::vector<T> is like that,
so what's exactly the difference here?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk