Subject: Re: [boost] [block_ptr] & Java
From: Jens Weller (JensWeller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-30 16:43:43
> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. August 2013 um 22:31 Uhr
> Von: "Phil Bouchard" <philippe_at_[hidden]>
> An: boost_at_[hidden]
> Betreff: Re: [boost] [block_ptr] & Java
> On 8/27/2013 1:07 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> > On 8/27/2013 12:22 PM, Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte wrote:
> >> "Memory manager" is very vague.
> > Well it's a deterministic memory manager because the time of the
> > destruction of the objects is predictable.
> > If it was ported to Java there would be no need for the "finally" clause
> > anymore.
> I am not sure what else to tell you.
I'll just ask about the elephant in the room:
What does your block_ptr do differently then the for years known smartpointer implementation in boost?
Why is there a need for reinventing the wheel?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk