Subject: Re: [boost] [block_ptr] & Java
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-31 00:01:03
on Fri Aug 30 2013, Phil Bouchard <philippe-AT-fornux.com> wrote:
> On 8/30/2013 4:43 PM, Jens Weller wrote:
>> I'll just ask about the elephant in the room:
>> What does your block_ptr do differently then the for years known smartpointer implementation in boost?
>> Why is there a need for reinventing the wheel?
> Because cyclic pointers need to be handled explicitly with smart
> pointers whereas with mine it's done implicitly.
There's no one correct destruction order for objects participating in a
cycle. That's one reason most C++ garbage collectors collect memory but
don't run destructors. How does your system deal with this?
-- Dave Abrahams
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk