Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Removing old config macro and increasing compiler requirements.
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-12 10:59:08


On 07/29/2013 01:17 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> My preference is increasing the compiler requirement, because that may open
> up more similar opportunities for reducing dependencies and
> interdependencies throughout boost.

Hello,

What is the status of this?

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/243094

There is obviously no more I can do. I can't convince the boost
community to modularize if you don't want to.

I don't think the thread came to any definitive conclusion though and my
patch didn't get committed.

Should I draw a conclusion that nothing is ever going to happen?

Thanks,

Steve.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk