Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [COUNTERTREE + SUBALLOCATOR ] version 2.0
From: Francisco José Tapia (fjtapia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-13 12:09:28

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Borland and metrowerks compiler requirements?"
Previous message: Jared Grubb: "Re: [boost] [test] Interest in 'hamcrest'-style checks?"
In reply to: Francisco José Tapia: "Re: [boost] [COUNTERTREE + SUBALLOCATOR ] version 2.0"

I just modified the code of the class, changing the format of the functions
used as parameters from the format of std::function to the new as template
parameter, in order to eliminate the overhead of the call.

( Thanks to Rob Steward and Jeremy Martin-Shepard by their comments and
suggestions)

I changed too the documentation about the classes of the library, and
specially the new functions and the lock system and how to use explicitly
in the functions of the users.

I hope it will be more clear now

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Borland and metrowerks compiler requirements?"
Previous message: Jared Grubb: "Re: [boost] [test] Interest in 'hamcrest'-style checks?"
In reply to: Francisco José Tapia: "Re: [boost] [COUNTERTREE + SUBALLOCATOR ] version 2.0"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk