Re: [boost] boost::polygon type genericity

Subject: Re: [boost] boost::polygon type genericity
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-18 08:23:29

On 17 September 2013 20:28, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, T. Raykoff wrote:
>
>> OK.  I just officialy gave up on CGAL.
>>
>> It is between b::p and that c++/Delphi clipper library.
>
>
> Note that it could be useful for all 3 libraries if you explained what made
> you chose/reject them.

I'd also be interested in learning about Taavo's reasons.

I believe other Boost.Polygon (as well as Boost.Geometry) users would
be interested in any sort of comparisons with other geometry libraries,
so it's valid question indeed.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
"Participation in this whole process is a form of torture" ~~ Szalony