Re: [boost] Review request: Bumping borland, SunPro, mwerks and MPW compiler requirements

Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: Bumping borland, SunPro, mwerks and MPW compiler requirements
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-26 17:14:43

On 09/26/2013 11:01 PM, Glen Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> Does anyone on this list actually have a Borland compiler (especially a
>>> non-ancient one) for testing?
>>
>> No. I do occasionally get bug reports when some change breaks the current
>> Borland compiler (now by Embarcadero) though. So people are still using it,
>> at least for shared_ptr. But we don't have a tester.
>>
> I have Embarcadero C++Builder XE4 (and XE3) that I use for the 64-bit
> compiler (which is a working clang 3.x on Windows). On vacation now,
> but when I get back to Redmond next week I could help test with it.

Thanks! I'm particularly interested in whether it still defines
__BORLANDC__.