|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [interest] rich-typed smart pointers
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-05 16:10:33
On 10/02/13 13:34, Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
> Dear Boost members,
>
> I have designed a smart pointer that relies on the type system to
> offer safe and flexible automatic memory management at no runtime
> cost. It combines single ownership as in std::unique_ptr and reliable
> access from multiple places as in std::shared_ptr with some additional
> features. I believe it to be about as safe and practically useful as a
> smart pointer in C++11 could get.
>
> Further explanation and a proof-of-concept implementation is available
> over here:
>
> https://github.com/jgonggrijp/rich-typed-pointers
>
[snip]
If there were a templated owned_ptr CTOR:
template<typename Derived>
owner_ptr (owner_ptr<Derived> && source) : pointer(source.pointer) {
source.pointer = nullptr;
}
wouldn't that eliminate the need for the make_dynamic templated function?
Just wondering. I haven't tried it, but I'd guess it would work because
the ownd_ptr<Derived> could be constructed with the:
make<Derived>(t1,t2,...tn)
and then the templated owned_ptr CTOR would then convert that to the
base class?
-regards,
Larry
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk