Subject: Re: [boost] Support for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-09 01:53:03
On 10/09/2013 12:39 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
> I understand there's been some discussion about dropping support for
> compliers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION defined. Has some
> final decision been made about this?
What is the question behind the question?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk