Subject: Re: [boost] Support for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
From: Sergey Cheban (s.cheban_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 07:09:50
On 10.10.2013 12:21, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>>> I understand there's been some discussion about dropping support for
>>>> compliers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION defined. Has some
>>>> final decision been made about this?
>>> What is the question behind the question?
>> Once the decision is taken, I can get rid of some workarounds in the Boost
>> libs I maintain.
> Indeed. I already have patches ready to push which remove the use of the
> macro throughout boost.
I think it is reasonable to push them in several days after releasing
1.55 (providing there is no significant negative feedback).
-- Sergey Cheban
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk