Subject: Re: [boost] Support for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
From: Sergey Cheban (s.cheban_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 09:47:13
On 10.10.2013 17:08, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>>> I think it is reasonable to push them in several days after releasing
>>>> 1.55 (providing there is no significant negative feedback).
>>> That makes no sense at all. My patches affect the master branch, not the
>>> release branch.
>> The current gap between the trunk and release branches looks strange
>> for me. I've read several times about changesets that were living on
>> the trunk for a long time without being merged to the release. I think
>> that this practice is bad and the changesets on the trunk should be
>> merged to the release branch ASAP providing the tests are green.
> This is so shocking that I'm certain I've misunderstood you.
May be I just don't understand the current boost workflow. But as I can see the
current workflow leads to the problems like the following:
On 09.10.2013 3:12, Rich E wrote:
> I'm seeing that Fusion has not been updated with fixes for #5010
> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5010#comment:24> a /3/ /year
> old(!)/ bug, that is reported as fixed. Why is this? From what I can
> tell, changeset #4441 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441>
> fixes the issues I ran into, but the 1.55beta package doesn't reflect
On 03.08.2013 1:33, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Tim Blechmann <tim <at> klingt.org> writes:
>> i've reported an issue before that boost.test in the release branch is
>> pretty broken. *all* tests of the boost.heap testsuite segfault like this:
> There were no changes in boost release for several years. Can you wor karound
> it for now?
>> boost.test in trunk works fine, though ... i wonder, will it eventually
>> be merged to release?
> I lost my work on new docs unfortunately to broken laptop, still trying to
> revive it, but I'm lacking time to really get to it. Maybe this can give me
> another reason to finally push it out.
On 08.10.2013 12:50, Akira Takahashi wrote:
> 2013/10/8 Domagoj Saric <dsaritz_at_[hidden] <mailto:dsaritz_at_[hidden]>>
> With MSVC12 RC:
> * 1.54 and 1.55 b1 RC - lots of:
> ..\boost/iterator/detail/__facade_iterator_category.hpp(__166) : error
> C2039: 'assert_not_arg' : is not a member of 'boost::mpl'
> This issue fixed by this commit.
> However, not merge to release branch yet.
>> PS. If we've already been using git, you could commit your changeset
>> to your local repository.
> I'm using git-svn. The patches are written, committed, locally-tested
> and ready to push.
-- Sergey Cheban
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk