Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Documentation
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-11 14:49:09
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 11/10/13 15:31, TONGARI J wrote:
>> I think Doxygen is fine for "regular" libraries, but I always have a
>> question: how could a library like Spirit be doucumented with it?
> Same as any other library.
> You document the data types and the functions.
what about the type constraints - aka concepts?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk