Subject: Re: [boost] Support for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-12 09:16:50
On 10/10/2013 11:52 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
>> > But you wouldn't want to go back and make adjustments in the
>> > current code just to make it non-functional with older compilers,
>> > would you? What is the return on THAT investment.
> Cleaner, more readable code (hey, I won't be around forever :-)
Robert, we've been around this roundabout before. Please don't take us
around it again.
* Making the code look more like normal c++ (eg revisions 85957 and
85958), which makes reading/contributing easier.
It is easier to reason about modern code than code which is designed to
accomodate obsolete workarounds.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk