Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Documentation
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-16 05:16:43
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Robert Ramey
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:42 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Documentation
> >> Another test-case example?
> Here's my test case example:
OK - I'll rise to this challenge to convert to Quickbook and prepare C++ reference section using
Doxygen comments (as best I can, not being the library author).
But not for a week or too - the cement dust level is too high ;-)
--- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden] > > Why? The meta aspect of a library bumps the complexity of documenting > > it, so it's good to tackle meta-language-ish beasts first. Or learn to walk before trying to run? ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk