Subject: Re: [boost] [build] bootstrap.sh is still broken
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-21 13:38:20
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 21.10.2013 21:03, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
>> [Rene Rivera]
>>> Could you post the diff patches as attachments? It's almost impossible to
>>> deal with inline diffs to apply these. Even though I can't test any of
>>> this. I'm willing to apply the patches.
>> Thanks! Download this: http://nuwen.net/stuff/boost-**bootstrap.patch
>> As I explained in my mail, the diff for boost_1_54_0/bootstrap.sh is a
>> horrible hack and should not be applied. It fixes mingw but breaks
>> else. I would love to get a real fix for this, but someone would have to
>> The diffs for boost_1_54_0/tools/build/v2/**engine/build.jam and
>> boost_1_54_0/tools/build/v2/**engine/build.sh should be applied - they
>> mingw and should not affect anyone else.
>> [Vladimir Prus]
>>> And on the mingw topic, I might have missed something, but I think the
>>> issue is still mingw vs. gcc naming inconsistency between bootstrap.sh
>>> and b2 proper - which is ugly, but not quite a showstopper?
>> That's what my boost_1_54_0/bootstrap.sh diff is hacking around. It's a
>> showstopper in the sense that it completely breaks the build, and I
>> figured out how to evade it with command-line arguments.
> Ok. Rene, Steven, how about we s/mingw/gcc throughout b2 engine source?
Fine by me.. But since I no longer have, or can get setup, a MinGW install
it's not something I will be able to test at all :-(
-- -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk