Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?
From: TONGARI J (tongari95_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 11:07:19
2013/10/23 Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]>
> All is in the title: I would like to know if flat_map, flat_set and
> stable_vector have been proposed
> for inclusion in the C++ standard library, or if there are works going on
> to write such a proposal.
> I find that I use a bit more flat associative containers than tree-based
> standard associative containers
> in all my recent projects, and I think that having option in the standard
> to choose one or the other
> would be very useful for a lot of devs.
I wonder if we can choose the underlying container for flat_xxx, for
example, use deque instead of vector.
Or would it be better to make them as adaptors?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk