Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?

Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Are there flat_map/set and stable_vector proposals at work?
From: TONGARI J (tongari95_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 11:07:19

2013/10/23 Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]>

> All is in the title: I would like to know if flat_map, flat_set and
> stable_vector have been proposed
> for inclusion in the C++ standard library, or if there are works going on
> to write such a proposal.
>
> I find that I use a bit more flat associative containers than tree-based
> standard associative containers
> in all my recent projects, and I think that having option in the standard
> to choose one or the other
> would be very useful for a lot of devs.
>

I wonder if we can choose the underlying container for flat_xxx, for
example, use deque instead of vector.
Or would it be better to make them as adaptors?