Subject: Re: [boost] [coroutine] Recommended documentation clarification
From: Jeff Flinn (Jeffrey.Flinn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-24 13:41:32
On 10/24/2013 11:40 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> the old version has some bugs and is therefore not recommended.
> Porting the code to the new interface isn't difficult:
> coroutine< void( T) > -> coroutine< T >::push_type
> coroutine< T() > -> coroutine< T >::pull_type
Also it looks like coroutine itself is now non-headeronly... is that the
case? Any other changes?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk