Re: [boost] [range] RFC: span(iterator, size)

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] RFC: span(iterator, size)
From: Akira Takahashi (faithandbrave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-29 14:32:40

2013/10/30 Akira Takahashi <faithandbrave_at_[hidden]>

>
> 2013/10/30 TONGARI J <tongari95_at_[hidden]>
>
>> ...
>>
> Second, I rethink interface by first reason:
> r | random_access_taken(n); or
> r | random_access_span(n);
>
> I don't think useful the function (explicit efficient phrase).
> At least, we need better name for random access.
>

Sorry, I read mistake. you don't want explicit efficient for random access.