Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Improving/splitting up detail
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-02 05:27:43

On 2 November 2013 07:23, Daniel Pfeifer <daniel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I prefer to have no such "detail" libraries at all. Everything that is
> useful to a broader audience should be in utility.

The problem there is that these things haven't been reviewed. The
solution for such things was to put them in 'pending' (if they were
going to be reviewed) or 'detail' otherwise. We need to establish a
better convention.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at