Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-03 13:54:19

On 11/01/2013 06:33 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
> But it doesn't make any sense to do this now. It's almost 2014.

Can you explain the connection between these two sentences? The first
c++14 capable compiler on the market (assuming that's the reference you
are making) does not change anything until it is the minimum requirement
for boost.

Thanks,

Steve.