Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Radix-2 typedef naming convention
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-05 13:36:54
>> So bit counts have to use a different naming convention to avoid
>> How about:
> I'm not sure what these actually provide.
We're trying to find "good" names for the software emulations of the IEEE
single/double and quad precision (32, 64 and 128 bit) types.
> Is cpp_bin_float_double the same as the current
We don't have anything currently.
> and *emulates* std::float64_t which is true IEEE layout 64-bit double?
> whereas float_53_t has 53 significand but a much bigger exponent)?
No the same exponent range, and the same behavior in all aspects except size
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk