Subject: Re: [boost] [1.55.0] Release candidate 2 available
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-06 11:20:14
On 6 November 2013 14:34, Sergey Cheban <s.cheban_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 06.11.2013 16:56, Daniel James wrote:
>> It's too late. There were reports of this after the first release
>> candidate (and earlier), and no one did anything.
> There were only 4 days between RC1 and RC2.
I managed to get a change in during that period, as did others. The
problem was present in the beta release, which was about a month ago,
so there was time to deal with it.
>> Regardless, Visual C++ 12 isn't even listed as a test compiler and
>> there are numerous problems with it, it's not worth delaying the
>> release further.
btw. that's my opinion, not an official "release manager" statement.
Just in case that wasn't clear.
> I don't know why VC12 isn't listed as a test compiler. We have the
> regression test results for it:
The list only includes testers that were available at the time of the
beta release. Visual C++ 12 was added quite late in the release cycle,
and initial test runs were not very regular.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk