Re: [boost] [range] fat iterators?

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] fat iterators?
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-07 12:27:50

>> The trick, of course, will be keeping intermediate temporary ranges
>> alive long enough to avoid lifetime issues when we chain adaptors and
>> assign the result to a local variable. I think a range library that's
>> sensitive to the value category of range objects and makes copies of
>> rvalue ranges would solve this problem. Thoughts?
>
> This is definitely something that needs to be added. The challenge is
> merely finding sufficient time to do so.

Jeffrey Yaskin posted a candidate design, implemented for filter_iterator,
here: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7630

What do you think about this design?

Regards,
Nate