Subject: Re: [boost] [range] fat iterators?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-13 04:31:22
On 12-11-2013 18:19, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 8:38 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> On 12-11-2013 16:41, Eric Niebler wrote:
> I should use EBO, but that's not the right place for it. It adds a bunch
> of associated namespaces to the filter_range type. Rather, the predicate
> and the adapted range should be in a compressed pair. I have this
> working locally already. The space savings are worth it: a filtered,
> filtered, transformed range goes from 24 bytes to 16.
> So yes, it needs to store the pred. One of my breaking changes is to
> allow the "filter" name to be reused such that these two are equivalent:
> vec | filter(pred)
> filter(vec, pred)
> I want this. I never liked "filtered" or the adaptors namespace.
Sounds reasonable. Your implementation looks good.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk