Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [TypeIndex] Peer review period for library acceptance begins, ending Thurs 21st Nov
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-14 15:29:25


On 14 Nov 2013 at 7:01, Steven Watanabe wrote:

> No, it is not harmless. You cannot safely assume
> that undefined behavior is ever harmless, just
> because you can't think of anything that can go wrong.
> In particular, the compiler is free to make assumptions
> that can cause your code to miscompile with optimizations on.

For the purposes of my peer review report, can you say if you know of
any misoperation which any major compiler might do in this
circumstance?

Niall

-- 
Currently unemployed and looking for work.
Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/



Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk