Re: [boost] [TypeIndex] Peer review period for library acceptance begins, ending Thurs 21st Nov

Subject: Re: [boost] [TypeIndex] Peer review period for library acceptance begins, ending Thurs 21st Nov
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-16 05:46:14

On Friday 15 November 2013 19:51:35 Antony Polukhin wrote:
> 2013/11/14 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
> <...>
> 
> > class type_index
> > {
> > 
> >   boost::type_info const* m_type_info;
> > 
> > public:
> >   explicit type_index(boost::type_info const&);
> >   boost::type_info const& get() const;
> >   // as previously discussed:
> >   const char* name() const;
> >   const char* raw_name() const;
> >   std::string pretty_name() const;
> > 
> > };
> 
> Don't really like the "get()" name. Following name is more clear:
> 
> public:
>     boost::type_info const& type_info() const noexcept;
> 
> Ok?

Yes, that would be fine.

And another amendment. In my original pseudo-code type_id() returned 
type_index. It should actually be boost::type_info const&, and the function 
should be in type_info.hpp.