Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in a collection of call stack utilities?
From: Aurelian Melinte (ame01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-17 18:48:18
> Did you address any of the criticisms of your first version or design? It isn't fair to ask people to look again and find the same issues.
> How does what you've done compare to Artyom Beilis' library?
I believe I did addressed all except Artyom's suggestions to use another
API. This is code that uses Boost constructs and useable by older
You may find this library a bit more flexible and extendable than
Artyom's library but since it offers the same core functionality, I
think it is ultimately a matter of choice.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk