Subject: Re: [boost] [build] Default compiler options for a toolset
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-21 15:28:26
On 11/21/2013 11:07 AM, Lars Viklund wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:33:33PM -0500, Edward Diener wrote:
>> I disagree. When/if clang changes the particular jam file should change
> What about people that must, want to, or need to use a Boost version
> released with the proposed /EH muting in effect together with a future
> clang-cl compiler that actually implements /EH.
Why in the world would I add a compiler option to a compiler which does
not support it just in case that compiler might support that compiler
option in the future ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk