Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [build] Default compiler options for a toolset
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-22 00:30:06

On 11/21/2013 9:35 PM, Joshua Boyce wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>> Please go to the e-mail called "Clang windows toolset" on the Boost Build
>> mailing list and download the attached files there by 'tr1gun' and do
>> whatever you wish with them. I am just using those jam files locally in
>> order to test clang-cl on Windows using Boost Build for myself. You can do
>> the same also if you desire.
>> Given that the Boost Build mavens had no interest, and may still have no
>> interest, in a toolset for clang-cl, I am just thankful to be using the
>> product of another person's efforts to achieve my goal of testing clang-cl
>> with Boost and fixing problems in Boost that will make it easier for Boost
>> end-users to use clang-cl if Boost Build ever officially supports it. I do
>> not know who 'tr1gun' is but am thankful for his efforts. What I do locally
>> in order to correctly test clang-cl with Boost Build is my own business,
>> while whatever fixes I make to Boost for clang-cl in various Boost
>> libraries is Boost's business. But I have made no effort to promote the jam
>> files created by 'trgun' in any official way as a part of Boost or Boost
>> Build.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> Any chance you could share the changes you make to the toolset files for
> those of us who are also interested?

The only changed I made followed the "hackery" provided by Steve
Watanabe to get rid of the /EHs option. Other than that the files are
exactly those that were attached to the e-mail mentioned above.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at