Subject: Re: [boost] [Container] Priority Deque - Refinement
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-25 18:47:48
On 25 November 2013 12:30, Rob Stewart wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 4:08 AM, tim <tim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> having fifo/max lifo/min would be quite reasonable. a fifo of both min and max sides could probably be achieved by using use stability
> This didn't translate well to HTML-based viewers without font control, unfortunately. I think you were trying to append "two", but then I wonder if you didn't mean "too".
He meant s/use/two/ i.e. "using two stability counters"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk