Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CXX11_ATOMIC?

Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CXX11_ATOMIC?
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-29 18:30:08

On 29/11/2013 07:28 p.m., Peter Dimov wrote:
> Now is perhaps not a very appropriate time to ask, but why don't we seem
> to have a macro for the <atomic> C++11 header?

A bit of a nitpick, but following existing naming practice such macro 
should be called BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC instead.

Regards,
-- 
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com