Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CXX11_ATOMIC?
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-29 18:30:08

On 29/11/2013 07:28 p.m., Peter Dimov wrote:
> Now is perhaps not a very appropriate time to ask, but why don't we seem
> to have a macro for the <atomic> C++11 header?

A bit of a nitpick, but following existing naming practice such macro
should be called BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC instead.


Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at