Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CXX11_ATOMIC?
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-29 18:30:08
On 29/11/2013 07:28 p.m., Peter Dimov wrote:
> Now is perhaps not a very appropriate time to ask, but why don't we seem
> to have a macro for the <atomic> C++11 header?
A bit of a nitpick, but following existing naming practice such macro
should be called BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC instead.
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk