Subject: Re: [boost] [modular boost] non-linked headers
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-02 19:34:23
On 3 December 2013 00:17, Bjørn Roald <bjorn_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 01:11 AM, Daniel James wrote:
>> On 3 December 2013 00:08, Bjørn Roald <bjorn_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> yes, but b2 headers create hard links
>> It really should use soft links. Most programs don't change files in
>> place, so as soon as such a change is made the two entries will be
>> pointing to different inodes. Which defeats the purpose, since they
>> should always be the same.
> yes that would be bad.
> Is this behavior documented somewhere?
A bit of testing showed that "most" probably wasn't true, but it
definitely varies. But here's someone complaining about emacs breaking
'sed -i' also breaks hard links. I think it's actually configurable in
both emacs and vim, which is worse, because you can't know. The
problem is that it varies so it's unpredictable. Soft links are
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk