Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CXX11_ATOMIC?
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-03 05:27:02

On Dec 1, 2013, at 8:06 AM, "Peter Dimov" <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Rob Stewart wrote:
>> Add feature macros and test for them. The macros can be defined when the header is fully supported or for particular compilers.
> If you're agreeing with Beman that BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC should not be defined when <atomic> is not 100% conforming, then I disagree.

I replied, in another message, that Peter and Beman made opposite statements. Peter then claimed, in reply to me, that they did not disagree. I can't read the quote above any other way, so I'm confused.


(Sent from my portable computation engine)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at