|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Git: maintaining super-project
From: Jeremy Ong (jeremycong_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-04 06:36:26
In the git world, it's more common for develop to occur on "master" and for
set releases to go to a "release" branch (with tags).
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 04.12.2013 15:27, Daniel James wrote:
>
>> On 4 December 2013 11:16, Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We're back to square one.
>>>
>>
>> You made a lot of assumptions and had a discussion where no one knew
>> what they were talking about. So you have to go back to square one.
>>
>> Checking out master branch of the superproject
>>> will only
>>> get you master branches of everything if:
>>>
>>> - as soon as anybody commits anything to master branch of his library, he
>>> creates
>>> a pull request for super project
>>>
>>> - this pull request is merged quickly
>>>
>>> Do you expect both conditions will hold?
>>>
>>
>> Why do you think we're going to be using pull requests for the master
>> repository?
>>
>
> Because no other mechanism has been documented anywhere that I can see,
> and because at this point,
> if some other mechanism is to be used, it would have been designed and
> documented already, prior
> to switching to git?
>
> - Volodya
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk