Subject: Re: [boost] [Thread] Looking for co-maintainers
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-09 13:12:54
Le 09/12/13 19:02, tim a écrit :
>>>> The future implementation is NOT stable. I don't know when the bug was
>>>> introduced, but it appears clearly now on the regression test as I have
>>>> wrapped the test on a loop to increase the change of error.
>>> Sorry, can I clarify, are you saying that the futures implementation
>>> in present Boost.Thread is not reliable?
>> This is what the regression test says :(
>> I started to see this bug with the clang asan11 tester, but looping on
>> the test shows that the problem is not limited to this particular
>> I've worked hard to find out the issue but while I have found some minor
>> issues, I have not reached to mix all the problems that appear now on
>> the regression test.
> btw, if the implementation used to work at one point and it is a
> regression, it should be possible to find the first broken commit using
> git-bisect ...
Right, this is my todo list.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk