Subject: Re: [boost] Splitting/rearranging Boost.Utility
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-12 03:28:46
On 12 December 2013 03:21, Ahmed Charles <acharles_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Perhaps we could get back to using this thread to talk about the future of Utility? I think there are other threads with the community team discussion going on.
Sure, go for it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk