|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [conversion] try_lexical_cast and 200$
From: Eric Niebler (eniebler_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-12 19:12:11
On 12/12/2013 9:35 AM, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> A little hackish, but:
>
> http://codepaste.net/py5ot3
template< class T, int = 0, class S >
boost::optional<T> lexical_cast( S const&, std::nothrow_t );
Is that even legal?! A non-defaulted template parameter after a
defaulted one? <boggle> How will this fare on older compilers, I wonder.
-- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk