Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Submodule's readme and logo
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-13 13:41:53
2013/12/13 Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Adam
> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 1:07 PM
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Submodule's readme and logo
> > There are already logos for some libraries:
> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/LibrariesLogos.
> These have provided people with lots of fun - but as far as 'branding'
> goes, they are a mess :-(
Yes, they have their own unique styles :)
> > Hence my proposal to use more consistent style in the case when someone
> would like to use it.
> > Personally I like to see some memorable graphics in docs.
> And I can see that you have had some fun with designing your much better
> and consisten collection.
> Thanks for putting in so much work on these.
> Others may be more enthusiastic?
I sometimes need to do something different than writing the code ;)
> >But I'm far from forcing the authors to use some specific ones or any at
> I think we should very strongly encourage a consistent look and feel of
> Boost libraries docs
> > Some basic, text-based README should be sufficient.
> Sufficient, but doesn't help with 'developing the brand' so should be
I agree with you, this was my initial idea, but people views are different
and I'd like to avoid forcing them to do something against their will.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk