Subject: Re: [boost] Release numbering
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-14 08:32:56
>> > Will the first Git release of Boost be 2.0? If not; why?
>> + 1
>> Why don't you start a separate thread so your suggestion gets the airtime
>> it deserves?
> I think the Git transition is a good time for 2.0.
> This would somewhat make it easy to understand what part of the history to
> look for in Subversion. The Git transition is major for Boost.
How about numbering releases YYYYMMDD - so for example the next might be
20140201 or whatever...