Subject: Re: [boost] The Community Maintenance Team proposal accepted
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-19 17:36:14
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I was reading the Review Wizard report and was wondering:
>> The following libraries have been accepted to Boost, but have not yet been submitted to SVN:
>> * Constrained Value - accepted September 2010; author: Robert Kawulak.
> This library is not in the initial list of suggested libraries to be
> maintained by the CMT, which is normal as it is not yet part of the boost distribution. However, I wonder if such edge case would be part of the CMT mission? An
> accepted library is basically an almost acceptable/complete version of the library, which mean that the code under review could be enhanced with whatever requests but managed by the CMT.
> I'm not sure it's really the role of the CMT to "save" such orphaned too early library.
I think that's clearly out of scope.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk