|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [git] tagging in modules
From: Cox, Michael (mhcox_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-28 23:04:19
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Peter A. Bigot <pab_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 05:09 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>
>> See
>>
> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/StartModMaint#
> Lightweightlibraryrelease
>
> Not relevant to the original thread, but since I just noticed it:
>
> git-push by default does not push tags: you need to specifically ask for
> the tag to be pushed (by name), or use --tags. So this sequence does
> nothing visible:
>
> git tag -a 1.2
> git push
>
Good catch.
> Personally I'd prefer if tag symbols were a little more informative than
> "1.2", and followed a pattern that places them in a namespace reserved for
> the module, such as timer-1.2.
+1
> Because tags aren't normally pushed, they're useful for individual
> developers to use as markers. However, git-pull will automatically
> retrieve tags attached to commits that are fetched unless --no-tags is
> given, so if a repository (from boostorg, or another developer) defines (or
> moves) a tag it might overwrite your local tag without warning. So it's
> important to know what tags you can expect might conflict with those in a
> remote repository to avoid conflicts.
>
> I'd also really like to see any module that uses internal versioning also
> provide a mechanism by which code can determine which version is being
> used. E.g., for the above there ought to be a <boost/timer/version.hpp>
> header which has:
>
> #define BOOST_TIMER_VERSION_MAJOR 1
> #define BOOST_TIMER_VERSION_MINOR 2
>
> Otherwise I'm not seeing any value for module-level version tags in the
> repository.
+1
> Matter of taste, though.
>
> I would expect, on superproject release, that each module would continue
> to receive a boost-X.Y tag marking the module commit that corresponds to
> the submodule SHA1 used for the release. This is another reason to make
> sure module-level tags are clearly distinguished (lest somebody think the
> tag corresponds to a boost version rather than a module version).
>
+1
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk