Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-06 04:22:18

Next message: Nat Goodspeed: "[boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [Removing support for old compilers]"
In reply to: Mathieu Champlon: "Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite"
Next in thread: Richard: "Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite"

I read more than half the documentation and so far I'm surprised at the
simplicity of the documentation.
It's efficient, even with a few strange problems that others pointed
already.

I'm considering using Boost.Test in one of my OSS projects, see how it goes.

Next message: Nat Goodspeed: "[boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [Removing support for old compilers]"
In reply to: Mathieu Champlon: "Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite"
Next in thread: Richard: "Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk