Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-08 10:20:02
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> One of the main questions arising for me when looking through the code is
> why doesn't the fiber class expose the same API as std::thread (or
> boost::thread for that matter)? This would make using fibers so much more
> usable, even more as the rest of the library was aligned with the C++11
> standard library.
To the best of my knowledge, Oliver is indeed trying to mimic the
std::thread API. It would be very helpful if you would point out the
deltas that you find distressing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk