Boost logo

Boost :

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-10 05:15:26

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Antony Polukhin
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:02 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden] List
> Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
>
> 2014/1/10 Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]>
>
> > 2014/1/10 Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > Scheduler does not look good. Class "algorithm" looks overcomplicated:
> > too
> > > many methods, classes from detail namespace are used in function
> > > signatures, looks like some methods duplicate each other (yield, wait).
> > >
> >
> > which one should be removed an why?
> >
>
> Do not remove schedulers. Just remove "algorithm" from docs and hide it in namespace detail.

And document the schedulers in a separate 'Implementation' section.

Paul 

---
Paul A. Bristow,
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB  UK
+44 1539 561830  07714330204
pbristow_at_[hidden]
Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk