Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] broken (fails to compile) with boost.timer since 1.48
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-13 07:50:54

Jamie Allsop <ja11sop <at>> writes:

> Yet was never applied. With

Yes. Timer change indeed makes sense. Not quite remember why it was never
applied. Maybe at the time I was looking to enhance performance testing in
general and got lost in many facets of new chrono library.

This needs to be done.

> Apart from that I'd like to see the suite of 4 patches applied as a
> whole. So far only has been
> applied but the patches address severe use-case short-comings in
> Boost.Test that make it viable for broader testing use. I've summaried
> them below.
> *
> * (small)
> * (small)

These will need to be reviewed again. I remember having some issues with


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at