Subject: Re: [boost] [test] broken (fails to compile) with boost.timer since 1.48
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-13 07:50:54
Jamie Allsop <ja11sop <at> yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Yet https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7397 was never applied. With
Yes. Timer change indeed makes sense. Not quite remember why it was never
applied. Maybe at the time I was looking to enhance performance testing in
general and got lost in many facets of new chrono library.
This needs to be done.
> Apart from that I'd like to see the suite of 4 patches applied as a
> whole. So far only https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7410 has been
> applied but the patches address severe use-case short-comings in
> Boost.Test that make it viable for broader testing use. I've summaried
> them below.
> * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7397
> * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7417 (small)
> * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7419 (small)
These will need to be reviewed again. I remember having some issues with
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk